Okay, if you
have been reading my blog, or even just read the title block, you know where I
am going to come down on this. I teach
chess in my son’s grade school. Nonetheless,
there are issues with teaching chess in schools: promoting an elitist attitude, scaring kids
off, and finding adults to help! At the same
time, there are alternative games that encourage some of the same thought
processes.
First of
all, chess can be elitist. There will be
kids who join to prove they are smarter than everyone else. Worse, there are parents who push their
children into chess to prove to the world that their kid (and by extension, the
parent) is smarter than everyone else. I
have been to conferences for gifted children where chess clubs were promoted specifically
for gifted children, and I have mixed emotions about it. Chess is a great way to provide more
challenge to gifted child. It doesn’t
focus too much on one academic area, and doesn’t feel like “school work”. Lastly, because chess is “the game of kings”,
there are behavioral expectations that go with the game, including playing
quietly and with self-control and good sportsmanship. I worry about gifted children growing up to
be “egg-heads” and lacking the softer, interpersonal skills that are so
necessary for success at work and in relationships.* I don’t want to see chess become the exclusive
territory of the gifted, however. “Normal”
kids need fun mental challenges that help nurture the thinking processes and
teach personal skills too.
Yet, so
often (and maybe because of those gifted programs) those “normal” kids are
scared by chess, feeling if they are not “smart enough” to play the game. I frequently hear adults say this very thing;
we should expect their kids to feel the same way. This just isn’t the case. Anyone can learn the game. The child, or adult for that matter, may
never be the next Bobby Fischer or Judit Polgár, but can love the game and get
something out of it nonetheless. I am a
great example of this; I love chess and yet, with a rating in the low 1400’s, I
am only a class C player. I read chess
books when I have the time, but honestly I don’t expect to even break into the
B class at 1600. Having fun is far more important than winning or even being a great player.
(Otherwise I wouldn’t game at all!)
Lastly,
finding the adults who want to participate is difficult. In the public school system for Columbus, OH,
there has been an employee specifically hired by the district to provide those
schools with a chess program. That is by
far the exception to the rule, and that completely leaves out private schools
and small districts. It’s sometimes
tough to find adults to teach the gifted kids. Finding someone to deal with the rest of the
school population can be nearly impossible.
Nine Men's Morris - Promo image at Amazon |
There
actually are some advantages over a chess club with this approach. First of all, younger kids can be included
with games like checkers. There are a
lot of games that are variants on checkers, both more and less difficult. As the kids get older, they could be
introduced to pool checkers, which someday
I would like to learn. Furthermore, the
list isn’t limited to just abstracts. My
wife has had great success playing 20
Questions for Kids as a team game with the after school program. There are
teachers running gaming clubs at schools who are playing some of the other
types of games I discuss in this blog.
Games are so
important to intellectual and social development that I think all kids should
learn to play them. If your school doesn’t
have a chess program, consider a gaming program. If there isn’t someone to start it, why not
you? If none of that is available, at
least play at home. If you keep playing
and reading, I promise to keep writing!
It’s
Your Move!
Related Posts:
Related
Links:
Othello –
Board Game Geek entry
Mancala –
Board Game Geek entry
Nine Men’s
Morris – Board Game Geek entry
Backgammon
– Board Game Geek entry
20
Questions for Kids – Board Game Geek entry
Judit Polgár – Wikipedia entry
Bobby Fischer – Wikipedia
entry
* A few
years ago, it was suggested to my wife and me that our son might be
gifted. I am not sure how that actually
is measured, but I do know that he is a straight-A student. Our concern isn’t that he is provided an
advanced curriculum to further advance his intellect, though that would be
nice. Our main concern is that he learns
empathy, compassion, teamwork and leadership, growing up to be a productive
citizen and a faith-filled man. That’s
our job as a parent. In my engineering
career, I have met lots of incredibly smart people who couldn’t lead hungry Boy
Scouts to lunch, and can never see when someone is hurting. That’s not who we are raising Daniel to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Go ahead and trash talk -- I can handle it!